THE PRAIRIE EDITOR: Obama Did Not “Pivot”, But He Will
President Obama made an empty State of the Union speech, short on new ideas,
and long on old rhetoric. He did not “pivot” on the critical issues, that is to say, he
did not draw on any lessons from President Clinton’s experiences in 1994, and
decide to go to the operative political center on healthcare, trade, domestic
legislation and foreign policy.
It was a “brave front” type of speech, the kind which says “I am following the policies
I believe in even if they are not popular.” The problem with this approach, however, is
not simply that his agenda is unpopular, but that it is wrong-headed as well. No
matter what political “sweetmeats” or other favors he offers senators and
congresspersons, he no longer has the votes for his agenda. Democratic incumbents
can easily see the electoral handwriting on the wall, and nearly all of them are not
ready for premature involuntary retirement by angry voters.
So now there will be a period of verbal maneuvering and grandstanding by
the Democratic leadership until what is obvious to the rest of us even
becomes clear to them as well. In the meantime, opinion polls will continue
to disclose diminished support for most incumbent Democrats, increased
numbers for Republican challengers, and a persistent decline of the
president’s popularity. This may not go in exactly a straight line, but over
the spring and summer the numbers for the majority party will be bad news.
At the same time, the unprecedented grassroots organizing effort for the
conservatives will grow. The upset special U.S. senate election in Massachusetts
demonstrates that conservative voters will not be applying so many “purity”
tests that Democrats and their media followers have predicted. Yes, there will
be battles. For example, former state house speaker Rubio will probably prevail
in Florida, as will Governor Perry in Texas. Other conservatives will likely win in
primary contests with establishment moderates in some race across the country.
In other cases, especially in centrist states, the moderates will win. Almost all
Republicans, however, will express conservative economic ideas in November.
This presents the Democrats with a much more formidable challenge. They had
counted on a weak, unorganized and polarized-to-the-far-right opposition.
They thought they could win the battles of 2010 with rhetoric, as they had done
in 2008.
Almost a month ago (before Massachusetts), I wrote in The Prairie Editor that the
GOP could pick up 12 senate seats and 55 house seats. Most of my readers,
including conservative Republicans, probably thought I was daft. (I did request
that no one call 9-1-1.) Now I notice that many of my colleagues are suggesting
the potential for similar outcomes.( I may have even understated the numbers!)
At some point, cooler and savvier heads in the Democratic Party will prevail over
the amateur “true believer” crowd now in charge of strategy, and President Obama
WILL pivot.
Otherwise, the voters will clean Congress as it not has ever done before.

I think the situation is not yet decided. Many things may be threatened, tested and tried between now and the next election. And I believe President Obama is a quicker study than the pundits (including our Prairie Editor) would allow.
I mentioned hubris in my last post on this site. Hubris belongs to no one but the self-assured, over-confident and/or arrogant. Let’s see who fits that profile in November.